Here is a video that explains income inequality–by Robert Reich.
Click Here

I was doing research, gathering headlines for a post. But the headlines told a story of their own. So here they are: 2010 November 2010, Corporate Profits Hit New Record, U.S. Workers Still Struggling 2011 January 2011, Profits Are Booming. Why Aren’t Jobs? May 2011, Corporate Profits At All-Time High As Recovery Stumbles June 2011, Since 2009, 88 Percent Of Income Growth Went To Corporate Profits, Just One Percent Went To Wages July 2011, Corporate profits’ share of pie most in 60 years July 2011, A Boom in Corporate Profits, a Bust in Jobs, Wages August 2011, Companies near record profits amid high unemployment October 2011, While Corporate Profits Are At 60-Year High, Main Street Businesses Continue To Struggle November 2011, GDP revised downward; corporate profits up 2012 February 2012, Corporate Margins And Profits Are Increasing, But Workers’ Wages Aren’t May 2012, Corporate Profits Return To Prerecession Levels, But Job Growth And Investment Remain Weak June 2012, Corporate Profits Just Hit An All-Time High, Wages Just Hit An All-Time Low July 2012, The Economy Stinks, but at Least Corporate Profits Are at 60-Year Highs! December 2012, Corporate profits hit all-time high as wages drop to record low 2013 March 4, 2013, Corporate Profits Have Risen Almost 20 Times Faster Than Workers’ Incomes Since 2008

A new Report from the Congressional Research Services looks at tax policy and pfizer viagra price the economy raises questions about the relationship between taxes, savings, economic productivity, and income inequality. It states: “Throughout the late-1940s and 1950s, the top marginal tax rate was typically above 90%; today it is 35%. Additionally, the top capital gains tax rate was 25% in the 1950s and 1960s, 35% in the 1970s; today it is 15%. The real GDP growth rate averaged 4.2% and real per capita GDP increased annually by 2.4% in the 1950s. In the 2000s, the average real GDP growth rate was 1.7% and real per capita GDP increased annually by less than 1%. There is not conclusive online canadian pharmacy evidence, however, canadian online pharmacy viagra to substantiate a clear relationship between the 65-year steady reduction in the top cialis in 20s tax rates and economic growth. Analysis of such data suggests the reduction in the top tax rates have had little association with saving, investment, or productivity growth. However, the top tax rate reductions appear to be associated with the increasing concentration of income at the top of the income distribution. The share of income accruing to the top 0.1% of U.S. families increased from 4.2% in 1945 to 12.3% by 2007 before falling to 9.2% due to the 2007-2009 recession. The evidence does not suggest necessarily a relationship between tax policy with regard to the top tax rates and the size of the economic pie, but there may be a relationship to how the economic pie is sliced.” Full report:CRS: Taxes and the Economy No doubt, this will viagraonline-edstore.com generate a swirl of reaction. Stay tuned.